Re: [PATCH][DRIVER][RFC] CPU5 watchdog driver for 2.5

From: Dave Jones (
Date: Tue Feb 11 2003 - 08:11:19 EST

On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:26:20PM +0100, Heiko Ronsdorf wrote:
> > * I'm pretty sure that in general adding new code to /proc (that has
> > nothing to do with processes) is frowned on.
> I don't know how to track the watchdog. Suggestions are welcome.

Last week someone suggested a sysfs interface for the watchdog drivers.
If this is done, it should be in a generic way that all the watchdogs
automatically benefit from rather than duplicate the same sysfs
code in every watchdog driver.


| Dave Jones.
| SuSE Labs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:33 EST