Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

[Christoph Lameter - Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:28:14AM -0700]
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
>> Please check -- wouldn't it be better to use such a macro?
>
> Looks good. But could you rename OO_MAX to something different? There is  
> already s->max which may cause confusion because s->max is the maximum  
> number of objects in a slab. OO_MAX is the maximum mask?
>

I supposed it would mean maximum object number inside page (ie quantity) which
is happen to be the same value as OO_MASK. Maybe OO_MAX_OBJ?

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/