Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2001 - 05:36:52 EST

Next message: Peter Wächtler: "Re: Where does 'vmlinuz' come from?"
Previous message: Romano Giannetti: "User-manageable sub-ids proposals"
In reply to: Thomas Hood: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Next in thread: Thomas Hood: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Reply: Thomas Hood: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:03:48PM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote:
> But do you agree that the present code does NOT do this?
>
> The present code does not send 'n' events---only one.

Ok, thinking about this obfuscated code more, it would appear so. It
would also appear that when the suspend request comes from the APM bios,
the ioctl() method will not call send_event() at all - instead it comes
from check_events().

However, as I said previously, this is a minor issue. I'd rather the
major problem was fixed.

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Wächtler: "Re: Where does 'vmlinuz' come from?"
Previous message: Romano Giannetti: "User-manageable sub-ids proposals"
In reply to: Thomas Hood: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Next in thread: Thomas Hood: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Reply: Thomas Hood: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST