Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?

From: Thomas Hood (jdthood@mail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 20:03:48 EST

Next message: Michael: "2.4.17-pre8"
Previous message: Ryan Cumming: "Re: [RFC] Change locking in block_dev.c:do_open()"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Hood: "USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Reply: Russell King: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Sending 'n' PM_SUSPEND events because you have 'n' listeners
> on /dev/apm_bios seems to be a waste of time when it could be
> handled more cleanly.

But do you agree that the present code does NOT do this?

The present code does not send 'n' events---only one.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael: "2.4.17-pre8"
Previous message: Ryan Cumming: "Re: [RFC] Change locking in block_dev.c:do_open()"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Hood: "USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Reply: Russell King: "Re: USB not processing APM suspend event properly?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:24 EST