Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw (jbglaw@lug-owl.de)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:33:49 EST

Next message: Martial MICHEL: "2.4.14 -- boot stop at "usb.c: registered new driver iforce""
Previous message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: Kernel 2.2.19"
In reply to: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Reply: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Reply: Ben Greear: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>:
> On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > PROCESSOR=0
> > VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
> > CPU_FAMILY=6
> > MODEL=6
> > MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"
> > .....

PROCESSOR=1
...

> > . /proc/cpuinfo
>
> I think we have a winner! If we could establish this
> as policy that would be _sweet_!

What do you expect on a SMP system?

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martial MICHEL: "2.4.14 -- boot stop at "usb.c: registered new driver iforce""
Previous message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: Kernel 2.2.19"
In reply to: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Reply: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Reply: Ben Greear: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST