Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 19:17:47 EST

Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: ACPI "hlt" mode and SMP systems?"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
> wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>:
> > On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > PROCESSOR=0
> > > VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
> > > CPU_FAMILY=6
> > > MODEL=6
> > > MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"
> > > .....
>
> PROCESSOR=1
> ...
>
> > > . /proc/cpuinfo
> >
> > I think we have a winner! If we could establish this
> > as policy that would be _sweet_!
>
> What do you expect on a SMP system?

<IRONY>
ksh93 arrays
</IRONY>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: ACPI "hlt" mode and SMP systems?"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:33 EST