On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Russell King wrote:
> Richard B. Johnson writes:
> > This is bs semaitics. There is no way a READ can be posted. As I took
> > the time to carefully explain about WRITE posting. Further, of course
> > configuration transactions are not posted. Configuration and posting
> > are not even related. Configuration writes to the controller. The
> > high-bit being set tells the controller this is a configuration
> > "instruction". Such instructions are not "transactions".
>
> Well, obviously you are a greater authority on PCI than the public
> specifications produced by the PCI special interest group.
>
> My comment was word-unaltered extract from the official PCI 2.1
> specification. If it's not what you understand, then you are WRONG.
Strange! This guy's gotten all our PCI devices to run just fine, in
time-critical applications, no less.
Maybe you should learn the, as you say WRONG, knowledge also?
Very Truly Yours,
Charles Turner
Member(s) IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, AIAA
I speak only for myself, which is enough of a problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:32 EST