Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Mon Jun 12 2000 - 07:19:50 EST

Next message: Wolfgang Walter: "Oops..."
Previous message: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: 2.4.0test1-ac14: smp deadlock"
In reply to: colin@field.medicine.adelaide.edu.au: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
Next in thread: Christopher Fisk: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:15:15PM +1000, colin@field.medicine.adelaide.edu.au wrote:

> I would have hoped that Linux bundling decisions were exclusively
> engineering-based, ``For however strong a new prince may be in troops, yet
> will he always have need of the good will of the inhabitants, if he wishes to
> enter into firm possession of the country.'' [Machiavelli, the Prince]

Engineering also means 'getting along with the kernel folk'. See also my
post 'Reiserfs in the kernel: it's more than just the code'.

Regards,

Bert Hubert.

-- | http://www.rent-a-nerd.nl | - U N I X - | Inspice et cautus eris - D11T'95

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Wolfgang Walter: "Oops..."
Previous message: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: 2.4.0test1-ac14: smp deadlock"
In reply to: colin@field.medicine.adelaide.edu.au: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
Next in thread: Christopher Fisk: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST