Re: 2.2.0 Press Release -- an old draft resurfaces

Magnus Ahltorp (map@stacken.kth.se)
15 Jan 1999 10:05:16 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eric van Dijken: "Re: raid and 2.2.0pre6"
Previous message: Neil Conway: "Re: [uPATCH] SMP scheduling fix (?)"
In reply to: Linux account: "2.2.0 Press Release -- an old draft resurfaces"
Next in thread: Radovan Garabik: "Re: ipx"

> - support for IPv6 addressing (48-bit internet addresses);

48-bit addresses? I could agree that the end-user allocated network
would be /48 with Bob's RFC2450, but the above statement is plain
wrong.

Who has written this?

/Magnus
map@stacken.kth.se

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric van Dijken: "Re: raid and 2.2.0pre6"
Previous message: Neil Conway: "Re: [uPATCH] SMP scheduling fix (?)"
In reply to: Linux account: "2.2.0 Press Release -- an old draft resurfaces"
Next in thread: Radovan Garabik: "Re: ipx"