Re: > 256FD Patch for 2.0.35

William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com)
Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:10:16 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote:

> Can someone please point me to the canonical "> 256FD Patch" for 2.0.35? I
> looked in a couple places and didn't find a 2.0.35 version. Thanks.

I got mine from ftp.is.co.za/linux/local/kernel . The
documentation for v8.01 talks about patching 2.0.34, but unless I, too,
have hit a bad sector in wetware, it patches cleanly against 2.0.35. It
might be worth at least updating the documentation to reflect that -
oskar?
Cheers,
- Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unix _is_ user friendly. It's just very selective about who its friends
are. And sometimes even best friends have fights.
William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com)
Mason, buildkernel, and named2hosts are at: http://www.pobox.com/~wstearns
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html