Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:20:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:15:17AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > Shakeel Butt (4):
> > >   cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated
> > >   cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe
> > >   cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks
> > >   memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi()
> > 
> > The patches look good to me. How should it be routed? Should I take all
> > four, just the first three or would it better to route all through -mm?
> > 
> 
> I would like all four to be together and since most of the code is in
> cgroup, cgroup tree makes more sense unless Andrew has different
> opinion.

Okay, I'll route them through cgroup. The patches don't apply cleanly on
cgroup/for-6.17. Can you please send a refreshed set?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun