Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated

[Shakeel Butt]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 09:06:01AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:20:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:15:17AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > > Shakeel Butt (4):
> > > >   cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated
> > > >   cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe
> > > >   cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks
> > > >   memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi()
> > > 
> > > The patches look good to me. How should it be routed? Should I take all
> > > four, just the first three or would it better to route all through -mm?
> > > 
> > 
> > I would like all four to be together and since most of the code is in
> > cgroup, cgroup tree makes more sense unless Andrew has different
> > opinion.
> 
> Okay, I'll route them through cgroup. The patches don't apply cleanly on
> cgroup/for-6.17. Can you please send a refreshed set?

Yup, I will do asap.