Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated

[Shakeel Butt]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:15:17AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > Shakeel Butt (4):
> >   cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated
> >   cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe
> >   cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks
> >   memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi()
> 
> The patches look good to me. How should it be routed? Should I take all
> four, just the first three or would it better to route all through -mm?
> 

I would like all four to be together and since most of the code is in
cgroup, cgroup tree makes more sense unless Andrew has different
opinion.

thanks,
Shakeel