Re: [PATCH 5/7 v4] sh: remove sh5/sh64 last fragments

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

> On Mar 16, 2023, at 5:45 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi--
> 
>> On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Hi Randy!
>> 
>>> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the
>>> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers.
>>> 
>>> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst
>>> v3: skipped
>>> v4: refresh & resend
>>> 
>>> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst                           |    1 -
>>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst                    |    2 --
>>> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst |    2 --
>>> scripts/checkstack.pl                                     |    7 -------
>>> tools/perf/arch/common.c                                  |    2 --
>>> tools/scripts/Makefile.arch                               |    5 -----
>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile                       |    2 +-
>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh                 |    2 +-
>>> 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>>> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>>> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s
>>> 
>>> - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit
>>> - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit
>>> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit
>>> - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit
>>> 
>>> CROSS_COMPILE
>> 
>> This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't
>> find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please?
> 
> The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline.
> (commit 49deed336ef9a)
> 
> Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.)
> I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM.
> 
> I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH.

Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree.

Adrian