Re: [PATCH 5/7 v4] sh: remove sh5/sh64 last fragments

[Randy Dunlap]

On 3/16/23 09:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 16, 2023, at 5:45 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi--
>>
>>> On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> Hi Randy!
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the
>>>> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst
>>>> v3: skipped
>>>> v4: refresh & resend
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst                           |    1 -
>>>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst                    |    2 --
>>>> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst |    2 --
>>>> scripts/checkstack.pl                                     |    7 -------
>>>> tools/perf/arch/common.c                                  |    2 --
>>>> tools/scripts/Makefile.arch                               |    5 -----
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile                       |    2 +-
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh                 |    2 +-
>>>> 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>>>> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>>>> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s
>>>>
>>>> - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit
>>>> - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit
>>>> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit
>>>> - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit
>>>>
>>>> CROSS_COMPILE
>>>
>>> This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't
>>> find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please?
>>
>> The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline.
>> (commit 49deed336ef9a)
>>
>> Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.)
>> I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM.
>>
>> I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH.
> 
> Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree.

Just let me know if you want me to resend it.
Thanks.

-- 
~Randy