Re: [PATCH 5/7 v4] sh: remove sh5/sh64 last fragments

[Randy Dunlap]

Hi--

On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Randy!
> 
> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the
>> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers.
>>
>> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support")
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst
>> v3: skipped
>> v4: refresh & resend
>>
>>  Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst                           |    1 -
>>  Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst                    |    2 --
>>  Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst |    2 --
>>  scripts/checkstack.pl                                     |    7 -------
>>  tools/perf/arch/common.c                                  |    2 --
>>  tools/scripts/Makefile.arch                               |    5 -----
>>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile                       |    2 +-
>>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh                 |    2 +-
>>  8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst
>> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s
>>  
>>  - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit
>>  - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit
>> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit
>>  - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit
>>  
>>  CROSS_COMPILE
> 
> This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't
> find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please?

The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline.
(commit 49deed336ef9a)

Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.)
I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM.

I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH.


> Apologies that I didn't have the time earlier to start looking at this series!

No problem. We'll get there.  Thanks.

-- 
~Randy