Re: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: usefreezable blocking call")?
From: Paul Bolle
Date: Tue Oct 29 2013 - 17:16:11 EST
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
> In short, yes, it should.
> I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going
> to revert this one too.
If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/