Re: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: usefreezable blocking call")?

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Oct 29 2013 - 17:22:29 EST

On 10/29/2013 10:15 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
In short, yes, it should.

I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going
to revert this one too.
If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't

I'll ask stable to pick it up later (or you can do that too).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at