Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Sep 20 2013 - 01:30:13 EST


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20 September 2013 07:01, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry, looks like this one is not enough.
>>
>> please let me know if you prefer me send addon patch
>> or revised one.
>
> Atleast you can let us know what the problem is? And then we
> can decide on that.. But anyway, you can send a new patch
> based over latest linux-next (which will have your original patch),
> and then leave it onto Rafael to merge it or have two patches..
> (though I am quite sure he will not drop anything now, unless its
> too screwed.., at worst he might revert it..)..

looks like the crash is intermittent..., so i thought that patch fixed
the problem.
but later I found other suspicious print out.

please check new one:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2915181/

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/