Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Fri Sep 20 2013 - 00:23:44 EST


On 20 September 2013 07:01, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, looks like this one is not enough.
>
> please let me know if you prefer me send addon patch
> or revised one.

Atleast you can let us know what the problem is? And then we
can decide on that.. But anyway, you can send a new patch
based over latest linux-next (which will have your original patch),
and then leave it onto Rafael to merge it or have two patches..
(though I am quite sure he will not drop anything now, unless its
too screwed.., at worst he might revert it..)..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/