Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] bitops: Introduce BIT_ULL

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:00:34AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Adding BIT(x) equivalent for unsigned long long type, BIT_ULL(x).
> 
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/bitops.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
> index a3b6b82..34e9e94 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  
>  #ifdef	__KERNEL__
>  #define BIT(nr)			(1UL << (nr))
> +#define BIT_ULL(nr)		(1ULL << (nr))

We already have BIT_64 for that.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/