Re: [PATCH 0/8] ceph: fscache support & upstream changes

[Milosz Tanski]

David,

I guess that's really a better question for Sage. He sent my branch
(which includes your changes) plus a whole slew of things over to
Linus. I'm going guess that a small follow on patch is simplest but
I'll let him comment.

Here's the original pull request:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137849853203101&w=2

Also, so far after making this change everything is peachy and theres
no other regressions.

P.S: This is a resend because I did no hit reply to ALL, sorry for the
spam David.

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:18 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I think that change does the trick. I had it running on the same
>> machine for 5 hours and had the kernel forcefully drop some of the
>> inodes in the cache (via drop caches) without a crash. I'll send a
>> proper patch email after you take a look and make sure I did the right
>> thing.
>
> Do you mind if I roll your change directly into my patch and reissue the set?
> Or would you rather have an extra patch at this time?
>
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/