Re: [PATCH 0/8] ceph: fscache support & upstream changes

[Sage Weil]

On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Milosz Tanski wrote:
> David,
> 
> I guess that's really a better question for Sage. He sent my branch
> (which includes your changes) plus a whole slew of things over to
> Linus. I'm going guess that a small follow on patch is simplest but
> I'll let him comment.
> 
> Here's the original pull request:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137849853203101&w=2

...and Linus just merged it a few minutes ago.  This'll have to be a 
separate patch.  Sorry!

I have another pile of Ceph fixes that I will be sending in a week or so; 
let me know if you want me include the fix there.

Thanks!
sage

> 
> Also, so far after making this change everything is peachy and theres
> no other regressions.
> 
> P.S: This is a resend because I did no hit reply to ALL, sorry for the
> spam David.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:18 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I think that change does the trick. I had it running on the same
> >> machine for 5 hours and had the kernel forcefully drop some of the
> >> inodes in the cache (via drop caches) without a crash. I'll send a
> >> proper patch email after you take a look and make sure I did the right
> >> thing.
> >
> > Do you mind if I roll your change directly into my patch and reissue the set?
> > Or would you rather have an extra patch at this time?
> >
> > David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/