Re: [PATCH 11/44] cpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10 August 2013 13:53, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Around Sat 10 Aug 2013 12:14:07 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
>> and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
>> by cpufreq drivers then.
>>
>> This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
>
> Nice, thanks for cleaning up (-:
>
>> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your Ack but I have to NACK it :)

My patch was wrong.. It was based on the assumption that everybody who
had implemented a .target() also implements a frequency table and exposes
it.. And the generic routines I have exposed depend on that frequency table.
And this cpufreq driver doesn't expose that freq table...

And so this patch is dropped :(

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/