Re: [PATCH 11/44] cpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines

[Hans-Christian Egtvedt]

Around Mon 12 Aug 2013 11:37:45 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10 August 2013 13:53, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Around Sat 10 Aug 2013 12:14:07 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
>>> and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
>>> by cpufreq drivers then.
>>>
>>> This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
>>
>> Nice, thanks for cleaning up (-:
>>
>>> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks for your Ack but I have to NACK it :)
> 
> My patch was wrong.. It was based on the assumption that everybody who
> had implemented a .target() also implements a frequency table and exposes
> it.. And the generic routines I have exposed depend on that frequency table.
> And this cpufreq driver doesn't expose that freq table...

Right, my bad, I just looked at the code flow and saw that the generic path
did pretty much the same as the AVR32 implementation. Didn't consider the
table part as missing.

> And so this patch is dropped :(
> 

Ok, AVR32 driver should expose a frequency table then, which is quite simple.

-- 
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/