Re: New MFD tree for linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Samuel,

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:11:02 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:45:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch?
> > > I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge
> > > window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree.
> > 
> > I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch
> > of ...sameo/mfd-next.git".  If that has changed, please let me know.
> Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was not clear enough: mfd-next master is
> replacing mfd-2.6 for-next and mfd-fixes master is replacing mfd-2.6 for-linus.
> So no need to pull mfd-next for-next.
> 
> I deleted all branches but master from both mfd-next and mfd-fixes, so things
> should be clearer now.

OK, I will fix this up for tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature