Re: New MFD tree for linux-next

[Samuel Ortiz]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:45:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch?
> > I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge
> > window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree.
> 
> I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch
> of ...sameo/mfd-next.git".  If that has changed, please let me know.
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was not clear enough: mfd-next master is
replacing mfd-2.6 for-next and mfd-fixes master is replacing mfd-2.6 for-linus.
So no need to pull mfd-next for-next.

I deleted all branches but master from both mfd-next and mfd-fixes, so things
should be clearer now.

 
> > > What branch should I use of that?
> > Ah, I didn't see that the remote tree still carries the mfd-2.6 branches, I'll
> > remove them.
> > Please use master.
> 
> OK.  I will do that from tomorrow.
Thanks a lot.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/