Re: New MFD tree for linux-next
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Sun Mar 17 2013 - 19:45:37 EST
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch?
> I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge
> window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree.
I meant "I assume that I should still fetch the for-next branch
of ...sameo/mfd-next.git". If that has changed, please let me know.
> > What branch should I use of that?
> Ah, I didn't see that the remote tree still carries the mfd-2.6 branches, I'll
> remove them.
> Please use master.
OK. I will do that from tomorrow.
> > BTW, those two trees look very similar (in fact "diff -u <(git ls-remote
> > mfd) <(git ls-remote mfd-fixes)" only shows a couple of differences in
> > all the refs). You do realise that I can use 2 different branches of one
> > tree, right (as can others)?
> I understand that :) But using 2 trees rather than 2 separate branches is more
> convenient to my personal workflow.
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Description: PGP signature