Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[Yinghai Lu]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 08:51 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
>>> Do you mean we can remove numaq x86 32bit code now?
>>
>> Wouldn't bother me at all. The machine is from 1995, end of life c. 2000?
>> Was useful in the early days of getting NUMA up and running on Linux,
>> but is now too old to be a museum piece, really.
>>
>
> I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out.  I am wondering if
> there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.

Agreed!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/