Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/25/2013 08:51 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
> >> Do you mean we can remove numaq x86 32bit code now?
> > 
> > Wouldn't bother me at all. The machine is from 1995, end of life c. 2000? Was 
> > useful in the early days of getting NUMA up and running on Linux, but is now too 
> > old to be a museum piece, really.
> 
> I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out.  I am wondering if there are 
> any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.

Not much I suspect.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/