Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 02/25/2013 08:51 PM, Martin Bligh wrote:
>> Do you mean we can remove numaq x86 32bit code now?
> 
> Wouldn't bother me at all. The machine is from 1995, end of life c. 2000?
> Was useful in the early days of getting NUMA up and running on Linux,
> but is now too old to be a museum piece, really.
> 

I'd be very happy to get the NUMAQ code ripped out.  I am wondering if
there are any reasons to keep any 32-bit x86 NUMA code at all.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/