Re: Including drm-intel tree to linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Daniel,

On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:43:52 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The patches in my next queue are fully reviewed and (should) have seen
> at least basic testing. The additional QA on top is just normal
> regression testing and about every 2 weeks a manual testing cycle for
> things like hotplug on the bazillion configurations we support (since
> that takes our QA team about 1 week to complete we can't do higher
> frequency there). The reason we've put that next queue buffer into
> place was that before the pulls to Dave received essentially 0 testing
> from our QA, resulting in lots more regressions slipping through.
> -next-queued is also what I run here on all my machines and what patch
> development is usually based on for drm/i915.
> 
> Does that put your concerns at ease?

Some what, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature