Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, February 09, 2013 07:40:26 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 February 2013 05:38, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 02/08/2013 03:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> On Friday, February 08, 2013 09:02:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of
> >>>>> linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I already did. Please check for-rafael branch
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cool.  This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then?
> >>
> >>
> >> OK, applied to bleeding-edge.  Hopefully it will be build-tested over the
> >> weekend and I can move it to linux-next.
> >>
> >> I dropped the rwlock/RCU patches from Nathan, though, because I had some
> >> doubts about the correctness of the RCU one and the rwlock one alone would
> >> conflict with your further changes.
> 
> As soon as i read Rafael's mail, i realized Dirk's patch might be broken
> and immediately i saw your mail :)
> 
> @Rafael: Sorry for not reviewing Nathan's patch well. I didn't knew much about
> RCU then. I am going through its lwn articles now ;)

No biggie, I overlooked that myself first time.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/