Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Fri Feb 08 2013 - 21:10:43 EST

On 9 February 2013 05:38, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 03:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, February 08, 2013 09:02:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>> On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of
>>>>> linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq.
>>>> I already did. Please check for-rafael branch
>>> Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then?
>> OK, applied to bleeding-edge. Hopefully it will be build-tested over the
>> weekend and I can move it to linux-next.
>> I dropped the rwlock/RCU patches from Nathan, though, because I had some
>> doubts about the correctness of the RCU one and the rwlock one alone would
>> conflict with your further changes.

As soon as i read Rafael's mail, i realized Dirk's patch might be broken
and immediately i saw your mail :)

@Rafael: Sorry for not reviewing Nathan's patch well. I didn't knew much about
RCU then. I am going through its lwn articles now ;)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at