Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: make VT switching to the suspend console optional v3

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 01:55:44 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:26:26 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, February 04, 2013 01:37:20 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > KMS drivers can potentially restore the display configuration without
> > > userspace help.  Such drivers can can call a new funciton,
> > > pm_vt_switch_required(false) if they support this feature.  In that
> > > case, the PM layer won't VT switch to the suspend console at suspend
> > > time and then back to the original VT on resume, but rather leave things
> > > alone for a nicer looking suspend and resume sequence.
> > > 
> > > v2: make a function so we can handle multiple drivers (Alan)
> > > v3: use a list to track device requests (Rafael)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > for all [1-3/3].
> 
> Any chance for an r-b on the PM one at least?  Then Daniel could
> probably push this through drm-intel-next.

Done.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/