Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: make VT switching to the suspend consoleoptional v3

[Jesse Barnes]

On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:26:26 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Monday, February 04, 2013 01:37:20 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > KMS drivers can potentially restore the display configuration without
> > userspace help.  Such drivers can can call a new funciton,
> > pm_vt_switch_required(false) if they support this feature.  In that
> > case, the PM layer won't VT switch to the suspend console at suspend
> > time and then back to the original VT on resume, but rather leave things
> > alone for a nicer looking suspend and resume sequence.
> > 
> > v2: make a function so we can handle multiple drivers (Alan)
> > v3: use a list to track device requests (Rafael)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> for all [1-3/3].

Any chance for an r-b on the PM one at least?  Then Daniel could
probably push this through drm-intel-next.

Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/