Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] PM: make VT switching to the suspendconsole optional v3

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 01:55:44 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:26:26 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Monday, February 04, 2013 01:37:20 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > KMS drivers can potentially restore the display configuration without
> > > > userspace help.  Such drivers can can call a new funciton,
> > > > pm_vt_switch_required(false) if they support this feature.  In that
> > > > case, the PM layer won't VT switch to the suspend console at suspend
> > > > time and then back to the original VT on resume, but rather leave things
> > > > alone for a nicer looking suspend and resume sequence.
> > > > 
> > > > v2: make a function so we can handle multiple drivers (Alan)
> > > > v3: use a list to track device requests (Rafael)
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > for all [1-3/3].
> > 
> > Any chance for an r-b on the PM one at least?  Then Daniel could
> > probably push this through drm-intel-next.
> 
> Done.

Thanks, I've merged the first two patches to drm-intel-next, the i915 one
still needs a bit of care imo.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/