Re: [PATCH] allow gpiolib to be a module

[Randy Dunlap]

On 09/12/2012 12:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:

>>>> On 11.09.12 at 19:38, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +#ifndef MODULE
>>>  subsys_initcall(gpiolib_debugfs_init);
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>  #endif /* DEBUG_FS */
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef MODULE
>>> +int __init gpiolib_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +       return gpiolib_sysfs_init() ?: gpiolib_debugfs_init();
>>
>> I can't parse this, sorry the gpio subsystem maintainer is too bad coder.
>> What about something more readable?
>>
>> int ret;
>>
>> ret = gpiolib_sysfs_init();
>> if (ret)
>>    return ret;
>> return gpiolib_debugfs_init();
>>
>> I know it doesn't look as cool but it's easier for me to understand.
> 
> Okay, since you're the second one to complain despite there
> being other uses of the construct in the same source file, I'll
> replace it, ...


Does C just use the value generated from the left side of a ?:
expression for the middle (empty) expression or does it call the
function again (which would usually be bad)?


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/