Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead ofexplicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
> > > WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> for merging through any
> tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT
> removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next?

I think it would be better to route this one through drm-intel-next.
WQ_NON_REENTRANT won't be deprecated until after the next -rc1 anyway.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/