Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicitUNBOUND w/ max_active = 1

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:22:27PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
> > > > WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> for merging through any
> > tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT
> > removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next?
> 
> I think it would be better to route this one through drm-intel-next.
> WQ_NON_REENTRANT won't be deprecated until after the next -rc1 anyway.

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/