Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicitUNBOUND w/ max_active = 1

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
> > WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> for merging through any
tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT
removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/