Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf: memory load/store events generalization

From: Stephane Eranian
Date: Fri Jul 22 2011 - 17:14:35 EST

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> That looks okay as a first approach tool. But what people are most
>> often interested in is to see where the misses occur, i.e., you need
>> to display load/store addresses somehow, especially for the more
> But that's what it already does? Â(for loads, stores
> are not in there yet) Did you try it?
I meant displaying the load + data addresses.
I have not tried it yet, just looked at the patches.

> Or did you mean resolving the addresses? While I agree that would
> be useful that's a quite big task and I don't think it should
> be blocked on that.
I agree with you, just wanted to check on the longer term goal.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at