Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf: memory load/store events generalization

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jul 22 2011 - 17:01:18 EST

> That looks okay as a first approach tool. But what people are most
> often interested in is to see where the misses occur, i.e., you need
> to display load/store addresses somehow, especially for the more

But that's what it already does? (for loads, stores
are not in there yet) Did you try it?

Or did you mean resolving the addresses? While I agree that would
be useful that's a quite big task and I don't think it should
be blocked on that.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at