Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf: memory load/store events generalization
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jul 22 2011 - 17:43:13 EST
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:14:26PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> That looks okay as a first approach tool. But what people are most
> >> often interested in is to see where the misses occur, i.e., you need
> >> to display load/store addresses somehow, especially for the more
> > But that's what it already does? (for loads, stores
> > are not in there yet) Did you try it?
> I meant displaying the load + data addresses.
That's what it does already.
Or did you mean the instructions that caused them?
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/