Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf: memory load/store events generalization

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jul 22 2011 - 17:43:13 EST

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:14:26PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> That looks okay as a first approach tool. But what people are most
> >> often interested in is to see where the misses occur, i.e., you need
> >> to display load/store addresses somehow, especially for the more
> >
> > But that's what it already does?  (for loads, stores
> > are not in there yet) Did you try it?
> >
> I meant displaying the load + data addresses.

That's what it does already.

Or did you mean the instructions that caused them?

ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at