RE: [PATCH 3/3] dt: tegra20: Add ehci nodes to Seaboard.

[Andrew Chew]

> Although that said, since many of the USB properties are 
> board-specific
> and determined by system characterization, they aren't generally
> applicable to all Tegra devices. As such, should those values be moved
> into tegra-seaboard.dts instead? Perhaps tegra20.dtsi should specify
> the default values that the driver currently uses if not supplied with
> platform data though... I think the Seaboard values are the defaults,
> which still would make this patch obsolete.

Turns out the ones I put in tegra20.dtsi are NOT the defaults.  The defaults are in arch/arm/mach-tegra/usb_phy.c, contained in "utmip_defaults[]".

I think I'm going to put those utmip_defaults[] stuff into tegra20.dtsi, and override them in tegra-seaboard.dts.  How's that sound?

And since there are defaults specified in tegra20.dtsi, does it really make sense to also have default values assigned in ehci-tegra.c (for when a property is not present)?  I worry that the information is now duplicated.  If those properties aren't present, then someone's mucked with the tegra20.dtsi ehci properties.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/