Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api.

From: Florian Mickler
Date: Thu May 20 2010 - 05:11:31 EST


On Tue, 18 May 2010 15:11:11 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu 2010-05-13 21:11:06, Arve Hj??nnev??g wrote:
> > Adds /sys/power/policy that selects the behaviour of /sys/power/state.
> > After setting the policy to opportunistic, writes to /sys/power/state
> > become non-blocking requests that specify which suspend state to
> > enter
>
> Yeah, one file selects behavior of another file, and to read available
> states for opportunistic, you have to write to file first.
>
> I still don't like the interface.
>

Actually, what would be a better interface?

I wonder why it is not like this:

/sys/power/state
no change, works with and without opportunistic suspend the
same. Ignores suspend blockers. Really no change. (From user
perspective)

/sys/power/opportunistic
On / Off
While Off the opportunistic suspend is off.
While On, the opportunistic suspend is on and if there are no
suspend blockers the system goes to suspend.

Cheers,
Flo



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/