Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jul 18 2008 - 05:03:12 EST

Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
> Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Andi Kleen <andi <at>> writes:
>> > Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.
>> No - because then those handful of Solaris supporters will get one more 'proof'
>> in support of their claims of Linux copying Solaris - first SystemTap copying
>> DTrace and now version numbers. See how we stand a risk of ending up convinced
>> we do not innovate?
> "Support" - dtrace is based on the IBM work it seems, and the IBM work
> predates Solaris dtrace by a long time, so actually you could argue
> Solaris copied Linux but shipped first ;)

Actually SLES9 shipped with IBM dprobes[1] long before Solaris dtrace even
existed (and OS/2 did long before that). Back then the interest in it
was about zero though, which made SLES10 drop it again.
I think I was one of the very few users. Admittedly the early RPN
probes were also not particularly user friendly, but they worked.

I use this always as an example that even sophisticated users
like system administrators and kernel hackers are somewhat marketing driven.


[1] which BTW already supported user space probes
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at