Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

From: Alan Cox
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 14:28:28 EST

> maybe we could have 2008.7 instead. Or just increment the major version
> every decade, the middle version every year, and the minor version every
> time we make a release. Whatever.

Why 2008 ? We have lots of year systems beyond the specific Western one.
Surely "38." as the Unix epoch time...

And .. 2008 sounds so "old Windows numbering"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at