Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?

[Miquel van Smoorenburg]

On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 21:25 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Most drivers call pci_alloc_consistent() which calls
> dma_alloc_coherent(.... GFP_ATOMIC) which can dip deep into reserves so
> it won't fail so easily. Just a handful use dma_alloc_coherent()
> directly.
> 
> However, in 2.6.26-rc1, dpt_i2o.c was updated for 64 bit support, and
> all it's kmalloc(.... GFP_KERNEL) + virt_to_bus() calls have been
> replaced by dma_alloc_coherent(.... GFP_KERNEL).
> 
> In that case, it's not a very good idea to add __GFP_NORETRY.
>
> I think we should do something. How about one of these two patches.

And Andi wrote:

On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 00:59 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Anyways the reasoning is still valid. Longer term the mask allocator
> would be the right fix, shorter term a new GFP flag as proposed 
> sounds reasonable.

So how about linux-2.6.26-gfp-no-oom.patch (see previous mail) for
2.6.26 ?

Mike.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/