Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Mon Mar 03 2008 - 00:47:03 EST


On Monday 03 March 2008 04:01, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> in general,
> Agreed with we need bad memory treatness.
>
> > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */
>
> some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory.
> Why do you want introduce new page flag?
> for show_mem() improvement?

I'd like to get rid of PG_reserved at some point. So I'd
rather not overload it with more meanings ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/